Scholarly publishing reels from a stunning blow

306-hatton-090503The story that broke over the weekend concerning the activities of Elsevier and Merck wherein the authority of the peer-review process has once again been called into question will not prove to be a TKO for either player. However, it does serve to foreground the pressing need for scholarly publishers to step forward and restate with authority the unique values and benefits they bring to the publication process as they see it.

It is difficult to discern which party played the role of Pacquiao and who served as the hapless Hatton in this particular engagement, but what can be said is that both parties can expect to endure a degree of discomfiture in the near future.

Scholarly publishing has a strong jaw, but if it is to avoid the crushing left cross of the rise of the scholarly web 2.0 communities, it needs to be developing quicker footwork as it ducks and weaves, be prepared to roll with the web 2.0 punches, and be less predictable in its responses.

Hat tip to CBC.CA for the photo.

2 thoughts on “Scholarly publishing reels from a stunning blow

  1. An interesting, and disheartening, post and report. As an editor of academic works, I often suffer the inadequacies of a peer-review process that is no more than rubber stamping to maintain volume. Too much of the content I work on is so intellectually weak that I long ago gave up believing the gatekeeper argument. And as a publisher, I saw plenty of personality- and relationship-based peer review. But I’d not come across corrupt peer review until now. Sigh.

  2. Pingback: Headlines for May 3- May 8 | Health Content Advisors

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s